Thursday, April 24, 2025

Going back again

 

Brooding at my desk

From an open book

Resisting a hand full

Of sleep from time

To time, recalling

As I drift forward

Or aft the soft sail


Boat sway on a calm 

Day, Susan brilliantly

Smiling into a morning’s

Rising sun – time stilling,

Watching my main

Sail flutter, and never 

Caring until that time


Ran out and runs out still

Sitting here snapping awake

From my palm-perch which

I flex and flex until I have

The feeling back – the

Rest of me though loses all

That is back there once again

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Death application


If you wish to die, strike one on 

Your keyboard.  When the next

Screen appears, select your 

Reason from the ten provided.

After this you will need to strike

Your signature key.  If you 

Do not have such a key,


Go to the “create your signature”

Screen and create one.  You will

First need to answer the questions 

Listed.  You will be notified within

Two weeks if your signature has 

Been approved.  If your yearly

IRS Tax bill has been under ten

Thousand dollars a year, expect


Near-term approval.  If higher

You will be directed to a Grief

Counselor.  If after two years, and

With your counselor’s approval

You still wish to die, your request

Will be reassessed and you will

Be directed to a new Grief Counselor

Monday, April 21, 2025

Setting out on a new spring day

 

Hobbling along a cobblestone

Road, it won’t take long

To run me down.  How far

Can I get?  I’m sure they

Wish I were not out here 

Ahead of them again, but at


Least I’m no one urgent.

My existence anywhere being 

Merely overdue.  There were

Calculations, slide rules

At first and adding machines,

But now its smart phones and

Artificial intelligence.  It knows


Each step I take and where

I’m likely to go.  When I don’t

Go there, an algorithm files

Another complaint of the sort

I’m tired of responding to,  

Searching down this road

For a better place to hide. 

Sunday, April 20, 2025

Concluding strains

 

In the last act, viva voce,

The soprano softly sighed

Gasping the words of her

Remaining song.  They were,

She sang, of her love and how

I’d vowed to care for her


Until this our end now

Being portrayed.  I could   

Not then sing. I tried

Instead to smile.  Her wan

Look faded with each

Uttered word sung softly 

In diminishing refrains.


We heard the approaching

End. I sang the anguishing 

Solo as the lights dimmed.  The

Ushers jangled the doors wanting

Us gone.  With my hand in hers

I turned to the emptying chairs

And bowed -- one – last – time.

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Working in the Dark

 

     Having been given the murder
    I quickly scanned all the
    Previous detective had, the
    Rusty knife, the empty shells,
    The blood-soaked room, the
    Body stretched upon the floor.

    My old mind feared I wasn’t
    Up to the task; yet I’d always
    Managed once I focused upon
    The crime.  I stood in
    The dark and conjured
    The man who killed the woman
    Upon the floor.  The door began

    To open.  I drew my Glock and
    Moved against the wall.
    The killer had returned to
    View his crime.  He came
    In nimbly, firing, but I
    Was the quickest into his
    Darkness and into mine.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

No New Messages

  One more silence to add

To all the rest, resting in

Peace perhaps, he surmises

Leaning back into his agitation.

It’s hard to sort the maybe

From the inevitability of

Dissolution.  Words swirl


Perhaps, thinking thoughts

Being in nine decades

Past what most think

Convenient, too old to

Learn the new procedures,

Too set in his ways to

Accept the urging down


The stairs, the bucket

At the bottom, the crutches

And alarm clock chanting

Electronically with no way

To shut it off, the instructions

Being too small to read with

The weak eyes of such a man.

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

REJOICING THUNDER

 


I am running again, faster

Than before, with phantoms

Thrusting larger, slavering

Jaws joyful under smiling eyes.

Street after street we pass

Beyond the critics who can’t

Accept her as she is nor me,


Never having studied the wall

Nor seen its etchings, “snap,”

The whip flicks out.  I don’t

Feel it as it does.  My dog would

Field the insult if I did, caring

At its peak, and I’ve no

Wish to create more.


We come back up the canyon.

Careening cars flick by, whistling,

Honking.  There is a flutter of rain.

Nothing slows.  We’re again as we

Were earlier in the day.  She doesn’t

Pause to judge me nor I her – nails

Sparking on the road as we run by.


Further thoughts on the Dire Wolf


I went to Youtube to see what else was being said about the Dire Wolf.  The consensus seemed to be to take what the scientists said about how they made up the Dire Wolf, i.e., using as much actual Dire Wolf genetic material as they had, and then using a similar species, the wolf to make up what was missing.

I suppose I made some mental jumps.  I went past such quibbles without pausing.  But, now, moving back and looking at them, I ask, why would we want to bring back into existence a species that precisely uses a habitat that we destroyed ages ago?  Look out!  The way to the La Brea Tar Pits is thoroughly clogged with people nowadays.  

We don’t, but if we had the capability, we should modify the genetics of any species which was once solely dependent upon a habitat that no longer exists.  I’m not arguing that the scientists who created the animal that they are terming the Dire Wolf should have done that.  From what they described they don’t have the capability.  They don’t have the genetic material to accurately create the Dire Wolf.  As an acceptable alternative, they used as much Dire Wolf genetic material as they had and supplemented it with the genetic material of the closest species genetically available.

So, rather than celebrate the great achievement of Colossal, some are choosing to quibble about terms, criticizing the logic of calling something by the task designation: Dire Wolf, when they didn’t achieve it 100%.  The scientists were undoubtedly proud of their achievement.  Not us though, we’d rather quibble about what to call it.

I read someplace else that we are attempting to modify the genetics of some individuals so that they can endure the radiation they would be exposed to in travel to other planets.  Wonderful! Now let the scientists alone who want to enable the species they are calling Dire Wolf to have genetics sufficient to permit them to live on this one.

Some thoughts on the Dire Wolf

 


There will be an article in the 4-17-25 issue of the New Yorker on the Dire Wolf.  I am a subscriber and they also send me their news letter which also has this article.  


Much of the information contained in the article I had already encountered elsewhere, but I was shocked to learn at the end that the scientists do not intend to let their Dire Wolves, two males and one female, breed.   So I sat still for a long time thinking about it.


The Dire Wolf, they tell us some place doesn’t derive from the wolf but from the dog, Canis Familiaris.  Perhaps this breed of Canis Familiaris was never domesticated, but it could have been, as all dogs after them, that we know about have been. 


The article is full of how much the science costs, but there is also mention of application, which when it happens is a way to get paid for their work.  I suspect more than a few wealthy dog lovers would pay for a breeding pair of Dire Wolves.  The idea of the Dire Wolf as a pet was in this article dismissed, but the wealthy dog-lovers I imagine could spend a lot of time with them and verify that they are as safe, for example, as safe as any of the ferocious dogs you can see on Youtube being described as the best protection you can own.  The Dire Wolf, never trained to be a ferocious guard dog might very well be less dangerous than some of our ferocious breeds, some of which are larger than the Dire Wolf.


The tenor of the article prepares us to understand that an important impetus in the science is in getting the presently extinct breed back into nature in order to bring nature back into balance.  The Woolly Mammoth is described in that regard.  If they get this animal de-extincted, they can get herds of them shipped to Siberia where they can stomp and poop about and reestablish a balance of nature – make Siberia habitable once again – perhaps double the population of Russia, create more soldiers.  Putin should be delighted.


There doesn’t appear to be an equivalent niche for the Dire Wolf.   Some areas have been rehabilitated by the ordinary wolf, the wolf which had been part of nature before we killed them off.  They have been reestablished to good effect.  No one is likely, I wouldn’t think, to suggest that the Dire Wolf could replace them and do a better job.

But just being looked at by this dog-lover in the midst of his outrage, consider all the jobs we’ve given to the ordinary dog.  There is a very strong argument to the effect that we humans did not evolve all by ourselves.  We evolved in symbiosis with the dog.  For example, we could never have raised sheep that need the dog to herd and guard them.  We could never have established villages which needed dogs to guard and warn us of danger.  The list is long.  Everyone knows it. 


But, the scientist might object, just because the Dire Wolf is genetically a dog doesn’t mean it could ever be pet quality.  Look at the African Hunting Dog.  Can anyone imagine trying to make a pet out of one of those?  Well, maybe not.  And perhaps the Dire Wolf may turn out to be no more safe to cohabit with people than the African Wild Dog, but note that the scientists, without even raising the question has determined to let this revivification of the Dire Wolf die out.


The Dire Wolf went extinct just after humans during the last ice age came across the Bering Straits and south into the North American continent.  Many other species went extinct at the same time.  Maybe there were other reasons for the cataclysmic North American loss of species.  Never lost, were smaller canids that were less harmful and more useful and agreeable to humans.  


There is no evidence that the Dire Wolf was ever domesticated, and I’m not suggesting that they ever were, but what boots that?  Any day on Youtube you can watch videos of species such as the cheetah and panther that have been domesticated and are living uncaged in someone’s home.  Surely a form of Canis Familiaris wiped out during the taking of the Americas by prehistoric man should not be excluded because it once hunted violently in order to make its living.  We are all part of the species that once did the same thing.


Before posting this note, I read some other articles.  There are some who argue that too little has been changed from the present-day wolf for the now-being-touted Dire Wolf to legitimately be entitled to that designation.  Ah me, anyone exposed to the sort of breeding that exists in dog-show circuits might with the same justification deny that any breed is truly entitled to its name.  Whatever it is that is lying near me on the floor as I type, I have great affection for it, her in this case, Jessica, and whomever they are that are on 200 acres somewhere hidden and intended to live their lives as a scientific experiment, but prohibited from breeding and intended to die once again as a species, despite the vaunted term they bandy about, “de-extincted”


Sunday, April 6, 2025

A cold spring day

  You know how when you walk

Through mud each up-step

Involves a suction-pop telling

You you’ve left the earth

One step at a time, she being

Unwilling to let you go?

You might try dying


And break loose, but

She’ll hold you fast to

What she needs, and if

God lets you watch your

Remains, you’ll be 

Appalled.  The mud you

Slid through becomes you.


In all the earth there is a

Great coming back to what

Will be whistled out of 

The wind, and in that 

Bristling sound all of us

Will sense the force before

Which all of us answer. 


Not Breathing

        In past times swimming

I was determined in

Ways untested.  Far

Enough away to be

Able to say I’d given up

Thinking of being there,

Failing in being despite


The old confidence

I had back when melded

To my current state of mind

Which while blended

To each conscious step, left

When I dreamed of being

Beneath the kelp drifting,


Dreaming like a bass in

The sun which shined down 

Between the leaves bright

In the world where no

One breathes.  Small fish

Swirl away leaving large

Ones like me breathless.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Paradise Lost


Flying too close to the sun

Then lying panting as I now

Am with broken wing, all

Thoughts of vaunting my

Gladiatorial pretensions have

Faded beneath his causing,

As though He never noticed


Me, scrunched up in 

My room reading what

Ever is left.  He may not

Notice this reconciliation

As if it stands for all the 

Flying I’ve done and 

Thinking still to do in


These inept times, and there

Is no one left to compare

Them with.  What ever boast

I might think hasn’t wind

Enough in it to be heard

Beyond the room I’ve dithered

To.  There is still some


Barking to be done, but not

By me and squawking with 

McCaws who voice their own

Version of these times as I descend

And ascend the stairs beyond

My room, as I once approached the

Sun till He wearied and sent me here.

 

Days of sand and high dreaming

        I hopped from rock to rock

Not fearing what a misstep

Might bring.  I could dance

Away from any such thought

Or eventuality.  My days

In those leaps and landings

Were the words later heard


In a daze sitting at a

Desk dreaming I might

Hold my breath forever,

Phrasing the swirls and

Surges down here

Where one must belong

To a toiling or if not


To be a fleeing,

Days pinned down by

Circumstances and books

And well toned high

Heels not suited to

Sand but well trod anyway

Keening with seabirds’ swearing.


Around campfires dancing

What inklings rise up

Round about like worms

From moist soil look

Askance as I, have 

Their work to do

And I may have mine

It sometimes seems 


Late in the day torn

Bleeding from the 

Pushing and shoves of

Medieval medicine’s 

Demands, I have hand

Cuffs some place, 

Lost, perhaps, a sign


That I’ve been and

Then forgotten save

For regular visits

Not to be missed

Lest I fall from grace

And am erased 

Before my time.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

On the seeking of literary immortality

 David Pryce Jones in an article on Evelyn Waugh wrote, "About the best that most writers can expect from posterity is cultural embalming, probably in the form of a monograph written by some academic paid to read books nobody else is reading."  The prospective writer might take note of this as he evaluates, as much as he can, his future.  We learn from history that the term "immortal" was applied to a number of writers and poets, but if we examine those writers and poets we in almost all cases observe that their immortality has expired. 

Is the work of any modern writer or poet likely to be less transient than the tunes the modern teen-ager listens to?  I was once enamored of Chinese poetry before China transitioned into Maoist Communism.   I read poems about old men boating down to picturesque meeting places where they would drink wine and read recently written poetry to each other, poetry that they had written. They pretty much all seemed to write poetry.  It was enough for them if their friends liked it.  There was no thought of achieving immortality as poets.  They wrote for the joy of it and listened to each other read it in the same fashion. 

I wonder if in modern day China the poets I read (in translation) are still being read today -- perhaps only by "academics paid to read books nobody else is reading."

So if today a young person discovers he or she has writing ability, there is a great market in fiction of various genres, but perhaps, the the number of people who make a financial success of this approach isn't high.  There are several other fields that seek good writers.  In my own case, I was hired by the Chief Engineer of the Skybolt program back in 1959.  The Air Force complained that Douglas engineers couldn't write well enough to be readily understood by Air Force personnel.  I had a wife by this time who regularly spent more than I made, and since the realm of workers (not managers) at Douglas Aircraft was a meritocracy, I learned a variety of other skills and thus managed to work there as Douglas merged with McDonnell Douglas which was eventually bought out by Boeing. 

Now at age 90 I can sit in my second-story study and look out my window through the trees at mountains that were within walking distance when I retired here 25 years ago.  Now because of a damaged knee I wouldn't try to walk that far.  In any case I don't wish to.  I do still write a lot.  I keep journals, write a lot of letters, and a few articles and poems I might post on a simple blog that was set up for me by a nephew many years ago.  The stats tell me that 1,783,486 have looked at various of the articles and poetry since it was first set up. It's been convenient.  For example, I had always planned to study the American Civil War and so several years ago, did that.  I ordered probably most of the authoritative literature on that war from eBay and Amazon and joined forums discussing various matters, strategies, battles, theories about the merits of various generals, etc.  Tempers can run high on these subjects.   For many, I found, these Civil War discussions were overriding.  I was invited to stick with it and make everlasting friends with those I agreed with, but after I had enough, had written enough articles, I stopped, gave most of my Civil War books to my brother-in-law and went on to other subjects.

Another reason it does not seem wise to seek literary immortality is that our language is rapidly changing, and has been for a great many years.  No one will understand what we write in a thousand years.  Anthropologists and geneticists estimate that our species has existed for about 200,000 years.  We have had written languages of any sophistication for less than 12,000 years. 

One of our "immortal" authors, Geoffrey Chaucer lived from 1342 to 1400.  His famous work is the Canterbury Tales.  I've read them several times and took an upper division (elective) course in Chaucer where we were given to read him in the original to get the rhythm of his poetry correctly, but we weren't required to read him in the original for understanding.  And, unless one becomes a scholar and specializes in Chaucer and Middle English literature, one isn't going to be able to read this literature in the original with any degree of confidence.  Was Chaucer concerned about his "immortality?"  It has been only 625 years since Chaucer died and no one today is reading him in the original except for academics paid to read authors no one else is reading.  Even if we count translations, I wonder how many read Chaucer in translation today.