Tuesday, September 11, 2018
Waking
Night gave way to day
As we lay here dreaming.
Raising my head to check
The time I looked about,
While all the dogs still
Slept, and out the window
At the rising light,
Trees, the mountains
And everything else that
Became visible. A little
Later Jessica followed me
Downstairs. We went out
Back to take a closer look
At what the morning held.
Why is it on such mornings
A guileless suggestion
Will epitomize political
Deceit, and cringing, faddish
Twitters? A mourning dove
Begins a lament. A dog in the
Next yard emits a single bark.
Anaesthesiology
Counting back, 100, 99, 98,
My stepfather over-ruled my
Mother and bought me a Monarch
Bike; so at 12 I could ride for
The first time free of
Her oversight where counting
Forward was not an option.
Two years later he
Encouraged a philosophy
Student and fellow church
Member to talk me
Into a better view of the world.
Instead I told him the
Multitudes of my thinking.
Ninety-five, ninety-four –
I woke hearing an antagonist
Daring me to apply this furious
Energy to mankind’s good.
So remembering only that from
My nightmare, I took
Up the challenge
Of his presuppositions. I made
A point to stop there and
Wait. Let whoever keeps
Track go ahead. I’m weary
Of the frenetic nights of turmoil --
Rewriting the scripts of every
Remembered word and deed
As though I’d have a chance
In another life to do it
Right, or the courage
To step out in the sureness
Of a cadence-count
Drill instructor who
Has no double mind.
For this little while
My mind still reeks of
Multivariate forces forming
Webs too bedraggled
To break apart and form a simple
Life; so if that’s all there is it will
End in peace. If not, then war
Dreaming
I sat dreaming
Till Jessica’s shrill
Bark brought
Me awake.
I’ve never counted
On the good will of
Those who drive
On the 405
Worth having.
They hurry ahead;
So if I hang
Back in my
Cul-de-sac
With images of
Geese flying
Obliviously past,
What will it count?
Or if I
Busy myself
With the dictates
Of these dreams?
The Evangelists
What of the others
Left down below?
We told each other
We hadn’t power
To save them all, nor
Feed a multitude --
Just these few
Up here who we
Could see in deck
Chairs sunning themselves
Like us shielded from the
Push and pull
Of faulty planning.
We sighed at the others’
End and drank the
Dregs of
Forgetfulness.
We slept and had
Nightmares, and
Let our lives
Slip away.
Left down below?
We told each other
We hadn’t power
To save them all, nor
Feed a multitude --
Just these few
Up here who we
Could see in deck
Chairs sunning themselves
Like us shielded from the
Push and pull
Of faulty planning.
We sighed at the others’
End and drank the
Dregs of
Forgetfulness.
We slept and had
Nightmares, and
Let our lives
Slip away.
Friday, September 7, 2018
The poetry of Giacomo da Lentini
Giacomo da Lentini, The Complete Poetry translation and notes by Richard Lansing, publish by the University of Toronto Press in 2018
I wasn’t impressed with the poetry as translated by Lansing (Professor emeritus from Brandeis). He has the scholarly qualifications, but his poetry seems pedestrian. Of course, the original by Giacomo may be to blame, I don’t know.
An introduction was written by Akash Kumar (Assistant professor from University of California at Santa Cruz).
I was well into The Canzoni and Discordo when I learned that the latest scholarship indicates that this is actually a translation made by Giacomo of the Occitan canso ‘A vos, midontc, voill retrair’ en cantan” by Folquet de Marselha. The translator Lansing implies this is an original poem of Giacomo’s and merely based upon the poem by the Occitan poet Folquet, but Akash Kumar in his introduction writes “We are confronted with an even more explicit moment of translation in the canzone Madonna, dir vo voglio, in which Giacomo translates the entire first two stanzas of Occitan poet Folquet de Marselha’s canzone . . . But Giacomo does not merely turn one form of vernacular poetry into another; he works to create greater logical coherence in his canzone, transforms Folquet’s recourse to a philosophical principle into a zoological example from the natural world, and moves beyond the bounds of Folquet’s poem by adding three additional stanzas.” So, I suppose, we are to take this as a case similar to Edward Fitzgerald’s in which he translated the poetry of Omar Khayam, but so improved upon the original that one loses sight of whatever it was that Omar wrote and admires what became of it in the hands of Fitzgerald. But in the case of Folquet’s canzone, the Giacomo improvement isn’t clear to me and I can only judge by the poetry in English; which isn’t impressive (IMHO).
Why should we care about Giacomo of Lentini? Because, according to Akash Kumar, he is the putative originator of the Sonnet. Kumar finds a reference in Dante’s Purgatorio in which he credits the notaro [Giacomo was a notary in the court of Frederick II] , Dante himself, and one other with the creation of the new school of Italian poetry.
In the section Tenzoni I thought at first that Giacomo had written both sides of these debates, but not so. The Abbot of Tivoli really did write the three sonnets that Giacomo responded to with sonnets of his own. The same is true of sonnets written by Iacopo Mostacci and Pier de la Vigna (who achieved posthumous fame by being placed in the seventh circle of Hell by Dante for having committed suicide).
I was finally appreciative of a few of the 38 sonnets written by Giacomo. In sonnet 24, I was surprised to discover Giacomo exasperated:
My lady, your expression raised in me
The hope of gaining love and your good will,
. . .
But now you seem annoyed, so it is strange
That I, not having sinned, should make amends,
While you have seldom put your sail to use,
Just like a skipper who’s incompetent,
I really think it’s ignorance,
A knowledge lacking steadiness
That varies with each new caprice;
So you aren’t master of yourself
Nor of one in whom virtue’s firm,
And you won’t find true happiness.
In poem 30, Giacomo writes,
A love so noble seized my heart
That I despair of its success:
To choose to love a bird of prey . . .
And in poem 32, Giacomo writes
. . . But, Love in you I find the opposite,
Like someone who is full of perfidy,
Since at the start you don’t at all seem rank,
Then down the road you bare your evil hand:
You’re least endeared to those who serve you best,
So I declare you lord of treachery.
Most of the poems are properly admiring, and in accordance with the standards of Courtly Love, but in 36 I wonder if Giacomo doesn’t put himself at risk when he writes,
She has no fault of any kind
Nor any peer, nor ever had,
Nor will, such is her flawlessness;
I think if God had it to do,
He could not so engage his thought
As to create one just like her.
The Abigensian Crusades decimated Occitania between 1209 and 1226 and Giacomo would probably have been alive during at least the latter part of that crusade. Other Crusades were to follow ending with one against Aragon in 1285. So I wonder if an inquisitional priest wouldn’t have found fault with Giacomo for saying that creating a woman just like his love was something impossible for God to do.
I wasn’t impressed with the poetry as translated by Lansing (Professor emeritus from Brandeis). He has the scholarly qualifications, but his poetry seems pedestrian. Of course, the original by Giacomo may be to blame, I don’t know.
An introduction was written by Akash Kumar (Assistant professor from University of California at Santa Cruz).
I was well into The Canzoni and Discordo when I learned that the latest scholarship indicates that this is actually a translation made by Giacomo of the Occitan canso ‘A vos, midontc, voill retrair’ en cantan” by Folquet de Marselha. The translator Lansing implies this is an original poem of Giacomo’s and merely based upon the poem by the Occitan poet Folquet, but Akash Kumar in his introduction writes “We are confronted with an even more explicit moment of translation in the canzone Madonna, dir vo voglio, in which Giacomo translates the entire first two stanzas of Occitan poet Folquet de Marselha’s canzone . . . But Giacomo does not merely turn one form of vernacular poetry into another; he works to create greater logical coherence in his canzone, transforms Folquet’s recourse to a philosophical principle into a zoological example from the natural world, and moves beyond the bounds of Folquet’s poem by adding three additional stanzas.” So, I suppose, we are to take this as a case similar to Edward Fitzgerald’s in which he translated the poetry of Omar Khayam, but so improved upon the original that one loses sight of whatever it was that Omar wrote and admires what became of it in the hands of Fitzgerald. But in the case of Folquet’s canzone, the Giacomo improvement isn’t clear to me and I can only judge by the poetry in English; which isn’t impressive (IMHO).
Why should we care about Giacomo of Lentini? Because, according to Akash Kumar, he is the putative originator of the Sonnet. Kumar finds a reference in Dante’s Purgatorio in which he credits the notaro [Giacomo was a notary in the court of Frederick II] , Dante himself, and one other with the creation of the new school of Italian poetry.
In the section Tenzoni I thought at first that Giacomo had written both sides of these debates, but not so. The Abbot of Tivoli really did write the three sonnets that Giacomo responded to with sonnets of his own. The same is true of sonnets written by Iacopo Mostacci and Pier de la Vigna (who achieved posthumous fame by being placed in the seventh circle of Hell by Dante for having committed suicide).
I was finally appreciative of a few of the 38 sonnets written by Giacomo. In sonnet 24, I was surprised to discover Giacomo exasperated:
My lady, your expression raised in me
The hope of gaining love and your good will,
. . .
But now you seem annoyed, so it is strange
That I, not having sinned, should make amends,
While you have seldom put your sail to use,
Just like a skipper who’s incompetent,
I really think it’s ignorance,
A knowledge lacking steadiness
That varies with each new caprice;
So you aren’t master of yourself
Nor of one in whom virtue’s firm,
And you won’t find true happiness.
In poem 30, Giacomo writes,
A love so noble seized my heart
That I despair of its success:
To choose to love a bird of prey . . .
And in poem 32, Giacomo writes
. . . But, Love in you I find the opposite,
Like someone who is full of perfidy,
Since at the start you don’t at all seem rank,
Then down the road you bare your evil hand:
You’re least endeared to those who serve you best,
So I declare you lord of treachery.
Most of the poems are properly admiring, and in accordance with the standards of Courtly Love, but in 36 I wonder if Giacomo doesn’t put himself at risk when he writes,
She has no fault of any kind
Nor any peer, nor ever had,
Nor will, such is her flawlessness;
I think if God had it to do,
He could not so engage his thought
As to create one just like her.
The Abigensian Crusades decimated Occitania between 1209 and 1226 and Giacomo would probably have been alive during at least the latter part of that crusade. Other Crusades were to follow ending with one against Aragon in 1285. So I wonder if an inquisitional priest wouldn’t have found fault with Giacomo for saying that creating a woman just like his love was something impossible for God to do.
Saturday, July 14, 2018
The Latest Dig
I stretched my hand out
To where she was and
Unlike in years before
She let it hang, thinking
As she did some long ago
Thoughts, not seeing me
As she would have once.
On the cave floor
Archaeologists found
Innumerable bones, mostly
The very young or old.
The rest, the fit and healthy,
Died somewhere else,
Fighting to save
The rest for here with
Whatever serenity we
Survive to pretend,
Holding hands out
To those needing
To lie down here
On the cave floor.
Gunfire
Gunfire in the night has
Ben Trembling and
Jessica emitting shrill
Piercing barks. Duffy
Watches me, alarmed.
I imagine moving
Us somewhere else.
I enlisted July third
Or fifth in 1952.
Susan died July
Fourth, three years
Ago. A malaise
Has me reluctant
To leave the house --
As when I throw darts
And Ben lies down
Beneath the board.
My scores decay. I
Strain to reach these
Days for which
I never trained.
Torchlight II
I paint this glory
I used to hunt, the
Fleet of foot, the wise
In their own defense.
I prevailed time
After time with this
Very arm I paint with.
Some came here to see,
(They will not stay away)
What I do here and say.
I am bewitched they think.
Perhaps, but look at
All I’ve done. I hold
My torch up so they
Can see. They groan
Weakly, backing away.
I’ll not be with them
Very long, giving as I do
The remaining strength
I have to she who
Blesses my efforts.
Torchlight I
I painted by torchlight
In my cave, the
Creatures I’ve seen in
My long life. My left arm,
Crippled by a boar,
My right must with my life
Make these images
On the cave walls
Despite the elders who
Claim a closeness to
Gods greater than mine.
What have they but
Time and grayer beards?
I have this right arm
And the dreams given me
By the goddess who lives
Here calling as she does
For me to show her what
It's like outside, and the
Creatures I’ve seen,
As she sings.
Friday, June 15, 2018
On poetry and other abstractions
Anthropologists tell us that the first artifacts that conclusively tell us that the creator or creators were “like us” were the cave paintings, those paintings described in this article for example: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/journey-oldest-cave-paintings-world-180957685/
It seems unlikely that everyone at the time these cave paintings were created would have seen their value. I don’t recall any anthropologists commenting on the cave-painter’s contemporaries, but I’m assuming there were such people, people who did not have the ability to think abstractly, to substitute one thing for another. I wonder what they thought when they looked at him (or her) painting. Some perhaps were impressed. Some perhaps were not.
At what point and why did we become us? Some anthropologists are now theorizing that we owe our ability to speak to the Neanderthal – some genetic material we picked up during some interbreeding – that enhanced our ability to create complex sounds – words which are for the most part abstract (sounds standing for things), but beyond that sentences.
Anthropologists have no way of knowing when our ancestors began talking to each other in sentences, or even when they developed a fondness for poetry. But in pre-literate cultures we know that they told stories and sang songs around campfires to rehearse their histories, great battles, famous ancestors, etc.
The earliest poems that have come down to us are closer to what we imagine to be those camp-fire stories. They were popular narratives, usually involving rhyme, because rhyme is a memory enhancer as is song. .
A modern-day detractor might at this point say that if poets still did that, did what they did around campfires, told stories that had “clear . . . arguments . . . open to standard assessments of logical validity and soundness” then they would have no objection to poetry.
There is no question about modern poetry being more abstract than early poetic forms. And yet, when our first ancestor capable of abstract thought first painted in his caves, there should be little doubt that there would have been nay-sayers who would have objected that these paintings were “neither clear nor open to standard assessments of logical validity and soundness” – or whatever equivalent statements these naysayers were capable making back then.
In regard to modern poetry, most critics are people who cannot themselves write, and one of them, Trilling perhaps, wrote that critics often forget that the poem precedes the criticism. The critic does not get to say, “this is what a poem ought to do, say, or be.” The poem, like a painting, or a piece of music is an abstract creation. To say that any abstract creation is subject to a standard assessment would be like those who stood in the cave watching the first person who was “like us” painting and though they didn’t understand what he was doing, felt free to criticize him anyway.
It seems unlikely that everyone at the time these cave paintings were created would have seen their value. I don’t recall any anthropologists commenting on the cave-painter’s contemporaries, but I’m assuming there were such people, people who did not have the ability to think abstractly, to substitute one thing for another. I wonder what they thought when they looked at him (or her) painting. Some perhaps were impressed. Some perhaps were not.
At what point and why did we become us? Some anthropologists are now theorizing that we owe our ability to speak to the Neanderthal – some genetic material we picked up during some interbreeding – that enhanced our ability to create complex sounds – words which are for the most part abstract (sounds standing for things), but beyond that sentences.
Anthropologists have no way of knowing when our ancestors began talking to each other in sentences, or even when they developed a fondness for poetry. But in pre-literate cultures we know that they told stories and sang songs around campfires to rehearse their histories, great battles, famous ancestors, etc.
The earliest poems that have come down to us are closer to what we imagine to be those camp-fire stories. They were popular narratives, usually involving rhyme, because rhyme is a memory enhancer as is song. .
A modern-day detractor might at this point say that if poets still did that, did what they did around campfires, told stories that had “clear . . . arguments . . . open to standard assessments of logical validity and soundness” then they would have no objection to poetry.
There is no question about modern poetry being more abstract than early poetic forms. And yet, when our first ancestor capable of abstract thought first painted in his caves, there should be little doubt that there would have been nay-sayers who would have objected that these paintings were “neither clear nor open to standard assessments of logical validity and soundness” – or whatever equivalent statements these naysayers were capable making back then.
In regard to modern poetry, most critics are people who cannot themselves write, and one of them, Trilling perhaps, wrote that critics often forget that the poem precedes the criticism. The critic does not get to say, “this is what a poem ought to do, say, or be.” The poem, like a painting, or a piece of music is an abstract creation. To say that any abstract creation is subject to a standard assessment would be like those who stood in the cave watching the first person who was “like us” painting and though they didn’t understand what he was doing, felt free to criticize him anyway.
Monday, June 11, 2018
Bird Songs
The lantern burned down
Through the night but was still
Half lit in the morning. We yawned
Together, unzipped our tent
And stepped out before birds
Could sing or a breeze could
Flutter any tree leaves.
It would be like that for
Months on end, years even.
She could live in the moment
More than I who looked about,
While she was smiling,
For any threat coming up
The mountain or down.
An evil I didn’t know and
Couldn’t see swept by
And took her away while I
Sat Listening to her breathing,
A musical sound that
A bird might make
With enough warning.
Olympus
They’re angry. So am I.
Why don’t they add that
As well? I climbed higher
Than any they’d seen,
Solo too – no one holding
My ropes – just me finding
The random crevice,
The little indentation
For fingers and thumb.
“But you’ve never joined!”
They’d said. “It doesn’t
Matter what you do.
And you don’t exist unless
We say so. Forget
Your climbing gear!” I
Kept to myself from then on,
Wrote my poems in places
They’d never find, but
The gods were not
Amused. One fall
Was all they’d give me.
Book Business
I’ve run, dashing along
The sand, despite the
Wind’s hindrance. I’ve
Struggled, collapsing,
With mind buzzing
Feeling the end near
Even when young.
And the books: I tried
To read them all,
Running thoughts in
My head along the sand
And at home struggling
Through one after
The other. I dreamt
Of the World’s end
And that learning
Would be lost unless
I saved it. I watch
Ben sleeping,
Legs kicking. Who
Is it watches me?
Wednesday, May 30, 2018
Riding II
I had to learn as I rode
Back and forth on
The 405 never to let
My thoughts interfere
With my riding. Those
Who did not ride this
Way soon gave it up.
Close-calls were common
When a mind is allowed
To wander. Mine never did.
For years I rode never thinking
Of anything but the road
Until I got home and put
My bike away. Susan was
There then, drifting in and
Out between the lanes. She’d
Wake with a start as I set a
Tray of food on her lap. She
Smiled her thanks
But smiles no longer,
And I no longer ride.
Riding I
The roses always bloomed
For her, but not for me --
But I still feel an obligation
To Try. They ration water
Here and it seldom rains.
I encountered an Indian
In the dry river bed
Who asked for a drink
And I gave him one.
He went on ahead
With confidence after
Having said he was
Never here. I am
Here – at least for now.
I dreamed of office debates
And conflicts all of which
Demanded my involvement.
I dreamed I went outside in
The rain and covered my bike.
Later I rode home with
It stinging my eyes.
Her Hand
I tried to hold her hand
A little longer, gripping
It as firmly as I could;
Never willingly letting
It go, and its going
Was in one sense only.
I have it still whenever
I sleep, whenever my mind
Drifts it is there. Lights
Flicker and I’m never sure
Where I should be. Other
People are self-concerned,
Passing, looking neither
Right nor left. Susan
Unlike them is always near,
Here some place, saying
Things she said before --
The normality I’m left with.
We never discuss this
Arrangement. I simply
Assumed there would be one.
The Big One
Not everyone would see the flash
Or feel the heat of the explosion.
Night would be the most
Spectacular time, signs exploding
One by one. Sitting at a corner
With Duffy sleeping, Jessica
Peering through the windshield
Watching the cloud forming.
I had seen it in newsreels,
Backed into an alley
And turned around. I was
Unclear about surviving
Which in Cold-War days no
One was supposed to, but
Many survived Nagasaki
And Hiroshima. It could be
Done, and we were not near a
Likely target. Duffy climbed
Into my lap. Jessica continued
To stare with unflinching gaze
Through the window. Ben slept.
Sunday, May 20, 2018
Riding Alone
You imagine what it is like,
Riding the wind as much as the road,
A sprinkling rain dappling your visor.
You are enclosed, cut off,
Feeling you knew you would be
If you kept on thinking
As you did. You
Must be brought
To heal or be ostracized,
The traditional means of being
Cut off from the tribe.
You were not meant to ride
Alone and surely know
That through your DNA.
Riding alone you’ll one day
Find yourself under a truck
On the 405. There is no
Place, we’ve seen through
Our lenses, for a being
Like you – though as old
As you are it no longer matters.
Saturday, May 19, 2018
Straggling on the Beach
Stragglers on the beach –
Seaweed the next tide
Will drag back out.
The band has come
And gone – the prizes
Given. Those still
Here have nothing won.
Undone as we are,
Shirts and shoes
Bereft, eyes grit red
That barely see the
Passing of gulls, the
Raucous tribe that
Battles for the little
Left. Here and there
Sand crabs creep
Out to look and then
Slip back. Nothing
Remains but the crawling
Over to pass Beyond. I’ve
Passed beyond now many times.
On Getting Down
Catching myself dreaming I can
At least credit those fanciful
Scenes for the leaden moods
Of my mornings – but absent
Recollections, the heavy world
Is like scraps of paper
Jessica leaves strewn
On my study floor. I grope
About for whatever’s
There, raise my head and
With faulty ears listen
For something in the trees
Outside – birds perhaps
Or just the wind ending
This unsuccessful introspection.
I lift some weights, dash
About the house doing
Chores, see outside that
The heavy clouds have yet to
Lift. Without meaning to
I feel better in an hour or two.
Chances taken and refused
He hated to miss work
So he lay his head on the
Track knowing the train
would wake him. If it
Did the coroner
Wouldn’t say -- if
He knew, but how could
He know (a grisly pausing
In the reminiscence)? Those
Dangerous tracks when young
Come crowding back – I could
Have fallen from a balcony
Or an oil derrick while standing
On my hands. My friends
Took no chances and shied
Away from all I did though
Gone now from cancer and
Large quantities of booze.
My close calls lifted my head
From the track and drew me
Down from my high places.
Thoughts
Creeping up, he never heard
My thoughts. Writhing while
I watched, he didn’t care. His
Face contorted as the last of
His memories slipped away. I
Stepped aside to let them pass,
Marking, as I did, the place
With a turned-down page.
They won’t need us to fly
Or drive cars. They can
Rebuild our arms and legs.
Time was I climbed several
Peaks near here and could
See the activity below.
Time was I cared and said
So to the faces which would
Go blank as their thoughts
Went black and their
Tongues clogged, stopping
Whatever words they
Would say if they could.
Spills
I spilled a fruit-drink
Over my desk and down
The back. “Oh no!” I
Shouted as I always do.
Jessica barked, “What
Now?” She watched me
Intently as I rushed about
Wiping it up
With a towel, using
A cleaner, not getting
It clean enough. She
Sat still watching as
I raised my hands
In apology. “Sorry.
I shouldn’t have yelled.
Susan wouldn’t have,
But we don’t have her
Any more,” I said, going
On thinking Jessica
Came later. Susan
Was already gone.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018
The Body in the Backyard
I woke part-way, my mind spinning
With worry – Susan said it was not
Her fault, but sometimes it was,
And she wouldn’t remember; so
I tried to let it go. She said she’d
Take care of this one, but when
I sat up and looked out, the
Body was still there – in plain
Site – at least one leg was.
She had thrown a tarp over
The upper part. She descended
Further it would seem – this had
To be on me this time, but I
Knew nothing of concealing
Something like this. I imagined
Dragging him to the end of the dock,
Pulling him down into the West-
Wight Potter, down into the hold,
And sailing out, but how far
To go prevent his drifting
Back in? I kept drifting
Back into sleep despite needing I
Knew to get up. Get him into the
Potter would be very slow work.
I’d need to stock it for several days,
And who would manage Susan while
I was gone? Maybe if I hid him
Some place else, maybe cutting
Him up. I shuddered at the thought
of cleaning the mess, tip-toed
Down the hall to see if she knew
Who he was, shook her gently,
“What?” She groaned. “Do you
Know who he was?” “Who?”
She groaned again. “The man
You killed.” “What?” She said
Again, trying to rise. “There’s a
Dead man in our back yard. You
Killed him on the way home.”
“What?” She said again, eyes wide.
“Never mind,” I said in a calming
Voice. “I’ll take care of things.”
“Okay,” she sighed and lay back
Down. I tip-toed out, brewed
A cup of espresso, thought, and
Needed more. Who he was
Couldn’t be allowed to count.
I needed once again to think --
One final time to get it right.
Note: The West Wight Potter is a small sail boat designed for the rough north seas. I owned a Potter in the 70s and 80s. It was the first sail boat I took Susan out in and she loved it. Here are the Potter’s specifications: http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_ID=5153
In Declining Years
Lightning flashed in the west.
A black cloud-like dragon
Enveloped our world. “Sing out,”
A brave voice sounded – cut short
By a hacking cough, followed by
Clouds of smoke as he lit another
Cigarillo. “Oh ye doubters
In piles, from one end of my
Hall to the other.” He raised
His other fist and shook it.
The rafters rattled as
The dark cloud settled around
Us. Night in its most extreme
Manifestation trades away
Our sun for four planets, a
Meteor and a hand-full of
Asteroids. I thought there
Would be more of a conflagration:
Wars, fire and brimstone. But
We have aged and become too
Feeble to raise our hands in rage.
A black cloud-like dragon
Enveloped our world. “Sing out,”
A brave voice sounded – cut short
By a hacking cough, followed by
Clouds of smoke as he lit another
Cigarillo. “Oh ye doubters
In piles, from one end of my
Hall to the other.” He raised
His other fist and shook it.
The rafters rattled as
The dark cloud settled around
Us. Night in its most extreme
Manifestation trades away
Our sun for four planets, a
Meteor and a hand-full of
Asteroids. I thought there
Would be more of a conflagration:
Wars, fire and brimstone. But
We have aged and become too
Feeble to raise our hands in rage.
Friday, April 27, 2018
On poetry criticism
Perhaps modern discussions on criticism aren’t ever going to
go anywhere. The July 1994 issue of the The Times Literary Supplement was devoted to critical theory, but I
read only the essay, Doing Things with Words, Criticism and the attack on the subject" by Denis Donoghue all the way through. The other articles and
essays dealt with the modern (and I guess it is still modern) critical argument
that literature and art ought to be political. A poet arguing for
revolution in a Latin American country is good. A poet like Wordsworth who
wrote whimsical unpolitical poems for the most part is bad. The TLS
reviewers were uncomfortable with the need to politicize literature, but did
not (as far as I could tell by skimming the articles) actually defend poets who didn’t have political goals in mind when then
wrote.
Arguing against the consensus of that TLS issue, as Denis
Donoghue summarized, criticism has to be ancillary and subsequent to
literature. Years ago I read a lot of poetry that adhered to the
Communist Party Line. It was awful stuff. I think Harold Bloom
would argue that any poetry adhering to any party line must of necessity be
awful stuff. It can’t have been inspired by the poet. It must have
been inspired by the Party Line with the poet doing his or her best to do
something good with it.
Of course there is always the poet who says, in effect, “I
really do believe in the Party Line (of whatever) and so my poems are inspired
by me (however a poet is inspired) and not the Party Line. I’m not
convinced by that argument, but one can’t really argue with the poet who is.
The critic I am most impressed with in these later modern
times is Helen Vendler. Unlike I. A. Richards she does close readings,
and she is very good. She has no grand system or philosophy
of literature that I’ve read her arguing thus far, but she will argue that a
particular poem of Wallace Stevens is excellent, and proceed with a close
reading that will probably convince you that she is right. I appreciate
her sort of criticism.
I have read a number of critics in the past who take a
different approach, who do promote systems and philosophies (i.e., party lines) of poetry, and
while I can’t be sure that none of that sort of thing (especially the ideas of
T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound) isn’t stuck in my psyche some place, I can’t at
this moment bring a single bit of it to mind.
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
Running Still
I’ve been running half
The night, never finding
Her here. I saw the
Evidence of past hours
And now she’s missing.
They say this is normal
For this stage of things.
I don’t believe what
They say. I’ve heard and
Seen too much. They’ve
Been wrong at every
Turn. I can’t accept
This turning a page
In our album, seeing her
Thirty-one looking eighteen,
Her skin shining as she dived
Into a pool and when I took
Her sailing that first time
She smiled her delight.
A flock of pigeons took
To flight as I ran by.
In the Sea
I was diving back then,
Out beyond the surf
Or in it, whatever the weather,
Whether the water was murky
Or clear. I didn’t care.
It was the search I
Loved -- up the coast
And down, my energy
Upheld me. Looking back
Like old people do, I
I think I valued the
Process – what it
Was like to be there
Seeing fish of every hue,
Of every purpose
Look me in the eye
And wait for what
I next might do. Back
In those days everything
I said to the shore was lost
In eddies of misunderstanding.
Mountain Music
We liked the soft Mexican music
Wafting our way from a garage
Across the street. We used to
Stop at a restaurant in Banning
After having one of her
Medical examinations up
Over the mountain in Loma Linda
Where the best were said
To work; so it was strange to
See them fail again and again.
The music though was nice.
We knew the nurses and
Waitresses. Susan would
Forget but I’d remind her,
Standing at the side porch
Listening. Looking up at
How the sky had turned a
Pale shade of blue. She was
My great passion. I often
Wondered as she paused to
Listen, what I was to her.
Monday, March 19, 2018
Death March
“I’ll not give them the satisfaction,” I thought
In a quavering voice – so many had fallen --
I could hear the shots from where they did –
Feeling no fear of their consequence yet
Needing to be the good Marine – an example
To the long row ahead, seeing their necks
Craning to look back at me to see if I
Still stood, thinking if I did at my age
They too being younger might as well –
Those who fell, we knew, hadn’t the
Strength or resolve – fluttering
Hands, thoughts, vacant looks when
They thought no one was looking –
Someone like me though, used to
Long treks would put one foot in
Front of the rest – losing track perhaps
Of the steps: where they leave off and
Another’s began – where I began if
Memory hasn’t fatally fallen behind.
One of them opted out after breaking
Both hands in fights saying if one
Unflinchingly endures the pain, these
Miles upon menacing miles are mere
Grunt work – whereas the enduring of
Pain is the ultimate demonstration.
They watched our steps for the ones
Who stumbled, pulled them out and
Shot them in the head – where is the
Sacrifice in that? Where the bravery
In a false step? The implications, the
Conclusions contingent upon whatever
Flew off with our steps, step after
Step – there were once paved roads, but
We were now on a rugged Jeep trail --
Even at night, marching route-step,
Staggering at thoughts of dropping
Out, perhaps rolling down a slope
When attention flagged, but best
That I keep on. The stars might
Find me out. I heard a shot far
Back where the strength to keep
On for those watching came from.
The Dance
Never touching, they danced
In an isolation gleaned
From others they had seen --
Arms and legs
Flailing, flaring into an
effervescent devotion.
Dranni with the flaxen
Hair sits on her porch
Braiding, brooding all
She has seen and felt
From the night before
Which weighs her down.
Should she be ashamed?
Why should anyone judge?
And she thought that no
One would, or if they did
It would be in a language no
One would understand. I
Was in the woods back then,
Covered in shadow, hiking
Rhythmically in my notion
Of how it came to be and
Would end, given its
Trajectory. Democracy had
Failed. Adams was right to
Fear the aristocracy which
When formalized became
A bureaucracy sponsored
By judges who used words
Only they could understand.
Ted Kaczynski thought he
Understood and wrote his
Letters which no one could
Dance to or feel his madness
Despite his careful phraseology.
They may be closing in for all I
Know – more come each week
Seeking a darkness of their own --
Tents pulled tight each night – Dogs
Heard to whimper, coyotes howl.
Eventually there is only the sound of
Heavy breathing and the smell of sweat.
The Thief
I saw him run across
My yard. I stepped out
As he struggled over my
Fence and paused at the top to
Give me an insolent smirk.
I followed him to the
Mall where he joined
Eight boys more and their
Leader who brashly
Watched – wary that I might
Be a challenge. “Good
Morning,” I said thrusting
Forth my hand. He smiled
Guilelessly. I went on to
The boy who smirked with
A start-something-and-you’ll
Regret-it smile. “Do you plan
To run through my yard again,”
I asked? “What if I do? You
Can’t stop me.” I grinned, “nothing
Back there I’ll miss if you want
It.” His brow creased. The
Smirk disappeared. “You called
Her beautiful, but she’s not.” He
Was puzzled – wanting an answer.
“Ah, but she was,” I entered onto
A more familiar path. What you saw
Through my window was her at seventy,
But look at me. I’m eighty three
And I remember all those years when
She turned heads. When men of all
Ages admired her. You are what, twelve?”
“Thirteen,” he lied. “You run in your little
Gang with your little friends never thinking
Until you look through someone’s window
That you’ll age – unless you are cut short
For your effrontery.” “You?” “No, not me.
“Are you a thief or a Peeping Tom?” “I’m
No Peeping Tom,” he growled. “I was
Just looking for something to take.” “Time
Will steal your years as it did hers. We liked
To hike through mountains on windy days.
Dust kicking up, watering our eyes. When we
Got to the top and stared back down it seemed
We would never die. I turned her gently
And looked in her beautiful eyes which
Twinkled as she looked back.” You’ve never
Known a look like that, and you never
Will, thieves are such short-lived
Creatures here . “I’m doing just
Fine,” he snapped. “So you say,
But there is no path up there
For you. You will never be as
Old as she nor see what age
Does to the face one day you might
Have shaved.” “You don’t know that,”
He said, wishing I would go away.
“Not many change – you in your
Small band steal small things
From houses and yards. You’ll be
In prison in six years and dead before
Your forty-five.” “Don’t talk like that! I’m
Sorry I saw the picture. Sorry she was
Old.” I smiled wryly, “seemed time
Someone told you what it's like if
You stay in school, learn what’s
Worthwhile and what is not.
You can’t see the mountains from
Here – too many years must pass.
You can’t imagine the beauty that
Will be there if you last. You’ll walk
With her on trails through rain and
Wind that creases the corners of her
Eyes. You’ll squint at what you see
If you can look back at the
Way you’ve come -- and if
No one steals her away.
My yard. I stepped out
As he struggled over my
Fence and paused at the top to
Give me an insolent smirk.
I followed him to the
Mall where he joined
Eight boys more and their
Leader who brashly
Watched – wary that I might
Be a challenge. “Good
Morning,” I said thrusting
Forth my hand. He smiled
Guilelessly. I went on to
The boy who smirked with
A start-something-and-you’ll
Regret-it smile. “Do you plan
To run through my yard again,”
I asked? “What if I do? You
Can’t stop me.” I grinned, “nothing
Back there I’ll miss if you want
It.” His brow creased. The
Smirk disappeared. “You called
Her beautiful, but she’s not.” He
Was puzzled – wanting an answer.
“Ah, but she was,” I entered onto
A more familiar path. What you saw
Through my window was her at seventy,
But look at me. I’m eighty three
And I remember all those years when
She turned heads. When men of all
Ages admired her. You are what, twelve?”
“Thirteen,” he lied. “You run in your little
Gang with your little friends never thinking
Until you look through someone’s window
That you’ll age – unless you are cut short
For your effrontery.” “You?” “No, not me.
“Are you a thief or a Peeping Tom?” “I’m
No Peeping Tom,” he growled. “I was
Just looking for something to take.” “Time
Will steal your years as it did hers. We liked
To hike through mountains on windy days.
Dust kicking up, watering our eyes. When we
Got to the top and stared back down it seemed
We would never die. I turned her gently
And looked in her beautiful eyes which
Twinkled as she looked back.” You’ve never
Known a look like that, and you never
Will, thieves are such short-lived
Creatures here . “I’m doing just
Fine,” he snapped. “So you say,
But there is no path up there
For you. You will never be as
Old as she nor see what age
Does to the face one day you might
Have shaved.” “You don’t know that,”
He said, wishing I would go away.
“Not many change – you in your
Small band steal small things
From houses and yards. You’ll be
In prison in six years and dead before
Your forty-five.” “Don’t talk like that! I’m
Sorry I saw the picture. Sorry she was
Old.” I smiled wryly, “seemed time
Someone told you what it's like if
You stay in school, learn what’s
Worthwhile and what is not.
You can’t see the mountains from
Here – too many years must pass.
You can’t imagine the beauty that
Will be there if you last. You’ll walk
With her on trails through rain and
Wind that creases the corners of her
Eyes. You’ll squint at what you see
If you can look back at the
Way you’ve come -- and if
No one steals her away.
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Madness
I often wonder if I’m mad,
Or if now and then in the past
I was, for was I not love-struck
Such that living without her was
Something I couldn’t bear to do?
But three years later I am perhaps
Living still as though a will
Divorced itself from the downward
Thrust of death which of course
Isn’t the same as bearing to live --
Listing here as though a boat whose
Hull was breached and was left at
High tide far up the beach, far
From the sea it used to sail.
The last leaf
The last leaf leaned
Into the wind, clinging
To its branch – not for
Any imposing reason
I suppose – watching
The wind whip it this
Way and that
I sat with my back
Against it, drifting my
Thoughts whichever way
It blew. I felt something
And tried to recall but
As I did I saw the
Branch stripped bare.
Susan at her window
She stopped paying attention
To her responsibilities;
Her thoughts wandered,
Sitting by her window.
Her coffee grew cold
In the cup upon her desk.
Her hand absently brushed
The wrinkles in her neck
Which he’d never acknowledged
Nor perhaps even seen
Being unequal to seeing
Her as she was. What was
She, she often wondered while
Fleeing the days when her beauty
Drew men in a consequent flood?
She needed to find a place to settle
And grow old with just one
Of them, someone strong enough
To remain but mild to be with –
Someone she wouldn’t need
To run from. Her eyes caught
The change in light – the rain
Fell gently – drops slid down
The glass. She raised her cup
And with her lips noticed the
Coffee had cooled – leaning
Back then smiling she heard
Each drop calling the time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)