Friday, July 5, 2019
July 4th 2019
Dreaded independence: Susan
Died this day four years ago --
Now bombs declare their dominion
Once again. Duffy again throbs.
Ben leans hard against my leg.
Jessica anxiously watches me
Creating competing sounds.
Duffy paws my leg
Wanting me to make it
Stop – this explosive
Ritual we endure again
‘Til the powders gone.
There is nothing for it but
That and gathering here
Waiting while the sounds die
Down and Duffy’s trembling
Stops. Ben moves away
And Jessica closes her
Eyes, tired of the fear
She felt. I lean back
In my chair at the end
And with my own eyes closed
See Susan lying downstairs
On the hospice bed sighing
The last of her life away in the
Silence following the sound
Of the bombs that died
Away with her last breath.
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
The progress of poetry
Is it linear progress:
Kingdoms, democracies, a
Global identity, reactionary
Brexits not withstanding?
Similarly is there progress
From Elizabethans to
Augustans on down to
Our Rock-Star lyrics?
I wondered if my task
Was to move poetry in
Another direction.
Chomsky told us we
Must enter anarchy
And I saw that we had.
Fatigued, appalled
I might be. It thundered,
Impervious to change.
It seemed enough here
Watching her fade year
By year to find the means
To write a new Inferno.
J. Alfred Prufrock explications
J. Alfred Prufrock explications
A common explication, an explication I would call banal, sees The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock as a character depiction of a man who lacks self-confidence, who dithers, and can’t make up his mind. As the poem proceeds Prufrock sinks lower and lower until he like a crab with ragged claws is at the bottom where he hears mermaids singing, but not singing to him. The voices he complained about earlier in the poem then wake him, get him caught up in their concerns, and he drowns.
I see the poem differently. T. S. Eliot knew (he wrote the poem at, I think, age 27) that he had it in him to be Prufrock, and that is what he became, but not totally. He knew what it was to be inspired during his writing of his poetry – the mermaids singing. And his early successes made him an instant success with the English literati. So should he have set his social and literary successes aside and seek the mermaids? Or should he ignore them and settle for the fame he had already achieved, something he valued greatly and wished to enhance. He compromised by devoting himself to criticism, teaching and publishing. None of which activities required his listening for mermaids.
Even though he has “heard the mermaids singing, each to each.” He does “not think that they will sing” for him. And yet he has “lingered in the chambers of the sea / By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown” until “human voices” woke him [with banal responsibilities] and he drowned.
What do critics do with a poet who produced relatively few poems but is still (or they want him to be still a) major poet? Another such poet was Dylan Thomas. In his introduction to A Reader’s guide to Dylan Thomas, William York Tindall (in 1962) wrote,
“Thomas wrote sixteen great poems – give or take a couple. Few poets have written so many. If I were making an anthology of the hundred best lyrics in English, I should include two or three by Thomas along with half a dozen or more by Yeats. To those who want to know which sixteen of Thomas’ poems I have in mind I offer a list of seventeen: “I see the boys of summer,” “The force that through the green fuse,” “Especially when the October wind,” “Today, this insect,” “Hold hard, these ancient minutes,” Altarwise by owl-light,” “We lying by seasand,” “After the funeral,” “A Refusal to Mourn,” “Poem in October,” “Ceremony After a Fire Raid,” “Ballad of the Long-legged Bait,” “Fern Hill,” “In Country Sleep,” “Over Sir John’s hill,” “Lament,” “In the White Giant’s Thigh.”
Tindall goes on to justify his choice: “Value judgments of this sort, notoriously subjective, and uncertain, are not unlike the reports of a winetaster, which depend upon experience in tasting. Saying that Thomas wrote sixteen great poems means that, having read his poems again and again and having read many others through the years, I find these sixteen agreeable. . . .”
Agreeable though they may be, my impression is that Thomas’s reputation as a poet is not faring well. He was a “rock star” in his age. That is, he had a beautiful reading voice. He did outrageous things. He spoke his mind regardless of the cost, and was a drunkard and womanizer. He was an interesting personality to a great number of people . But do many read his poetry today? Maybe in Wales, but they aren’t totally reconciled to his having written in English.
In T. S. Eliot’s case many still do read his poetry. I just reread The Love Song of J. Alfred Profrock” and found it . . . agreeable.
A common explication, an explication I would call banal, sees The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock as a character depiction of a man who lacks self-confidence, who dithers, and can’t make up his mind. As the poem proceeds Prufrock sinks lower and lower until he like a crab with ragged claws is at the bottom where he hears mermaids singing, but not singing to him. The voices he complained about earlier in the poem then wake him, get him caught up in their concerns, and he drowns.
I see the poem differently. T. S. Eliot knew (he wrote the poem at, I think, age 27) that he had it in him to be Prufrock, and that is what he became, but not totally. He knew what it was to be inspired during his writing of his poetry – the mermaids singing. And his early successes made him an instant success with the English literati. So should he have set his social and literary successes aside and seek the mermaids? Or should he ignore them and settle for the fame he had already achieved, something he valued greatly and wished to enhance. He compromised by devoting himself to criticism, teaching and publishing. None of which activities required his listening for mermaids.
Even though he has “heard the mermaids singing, each to each.” He does “not think that they will sing” for him. And yet he has “lingered in the chambers of the sea / By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown” until “human voices” woke him [with banal responsibilities] and he drowned.
What do critics do with a poet who produced relatively few poems but is still (or they want him to be still a) major poet? Another such poet was Dylan Thomas. In his introduction to A Reader’s guide to Dylan Thomas, William York Tindall (in 1962) wrote,
“Thomas wrote sixteen great poems – give or take a couple. Few poets have written so many. If I were making an anthology of the hundred best lyrics in English, I should include two or three by Thomas along with half a dozen or more by Yeats. To those who want to know which sixteen of Thomas’ poems I have in mind I offer a list of seventeen: “I see the boys of summer,” “The force that through the green fuse,” “Especially when the October wind,” “Today, this insect,” “Hold hard, these ancient minutes,” Altarwise by owl-light,” “We lying by seasand,” “After the funeral,” “A Refusal to Mourn,” “Poem in October,” “Ceremony After a Fire Raid,” “Ballad of the Long-legged Bait,” “Fern Hill,” “In Country Sleep,” “Over Sir John’s hill,” “Lament,” “In the White Giant’s Thigh.”
Tindall goes on to justify his choice: “Value judgments of this sort, notoriously subjective, and uncertain, are not unlike the reports of a winetaster, which depend upon experience in tasting. Saying that Thomas wrote sixteen great poems means that, having read his poems again and again and having read many others through the years, I find these sixteen agreeable. . . .”
Agreeable though they may be, my impression is that Thomas’s reputation as a poet is not faring well. He was a “rock star” in his age. That is, he had a beautiful reading voice. He did outrageous things. He spoke his mind regardless of the cost, and was a drunkard and womanizer. He was an interesting personality to a great number of people . But do many read his poetry today? Maybe in Wales, but they aren’t totally reconciled to his having written in English.
In T. S. Eliot’s case many still do read his poetry. I just reread The Love Song of J. Alfred Profrock” and found it . . . agreeable.
Friday, June 28, 2019
Coughing
In the middle of night a
Coughing loss of breath
Woke me, chasing
In another dream she
Who sped ahead.
Laden as I was
Unable to follow though
Once I was filled with
Froth. Through the
Years she skittered past
Leaving me racing – her
Mind beyond – mine
Letting her run as
She pleased being
With me through those
Years elapsing. This
Hunger, this waiting,
Filled my mind with
Suspense, bound she
Became to come to
Me as I lay back down.
Monday, June 24, 2019
We who won’t be moved
Despite proclaiming I’d never be
Moved, my knees seem weak, my
Feet slide, I stumble, and stagger
Several steps toward a
Solid-seeming stone-worked
Arch. I stand, shocked
At what is before me.
Looking into that space
I desperately wanted to
Go back– return to my
Study’s safe-haven and
See round about those I’d
Come to depend upon for
Stability during this holding-fast.
I laid my hand upon the first
Thing that came to mind
And held it while the world spun.
“Look you,” an old man said
To a child as they passed by.
“That man has hold of a
Monstrous thought and can’t let go.
Little glimpses of time
There is little enough
Left here now: wood
Chips for a fire;
Gravel to pile upon
The next one to die;
Wry comments on
The temperature
Inside and out . . .
We’ve paced back
And forth as long
As I can remember
And know the final
Result. What comes
Next requires
Arrogance and aplomb,
Though no one will
Believe thinkers with
That level of confidence.
Appeal will be made
To equality of thought
And a democratic vote.
Omphaloskepsis
He reasoned his way down
To this time and place
And sat legs stretched ahead
Like Gandhi basking
In his own wisdom.
“It is all done,”
He insisted.
Everything that once
Was has been discontinued
And everything before
Us has been disallowed.”
His beatific smile
Radiated self-
Congratulation.
“Worry not about
Future Warming.
I shall leave you ice
And to sooth your
Fears, each step
From now on will
Be someone’s last.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)