Germany expecting attacks from British terrorists

http://frontpagemag.com/2010/11/22/germany-on-high-alert/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_campaign=4060169dbc-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email

I know, I know; there are so many Islamist terror attacks that they get boring, but I notice that ". . . two Brits were said to be at the center" of this one.

I wonder if these two brits were among those who received early release from British jails: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8116234/Forty-six-dangerous-terrorists-go-free-from-jail.html

Or if not whether they were radicalized in British jails: "The Royal United Services Institute has suggested that as many as 800 Muslims have been radicalised behind bars and could present a security threat on release over the next decade. Terrorists who were eligible to be freed over the past two years included Abu Bakr Mansha, jailed for plotting to kill a British soldier, and Khalid Khaliq, an associate of the July 7 bombers who was jailed for possessing documents useful for terrorism."

Given this British philosophy, I think they should reconsider the Pit Bull Terrier. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndCommunity/InYourHome/AnimalsAndPets/Dogs/DG_180098 They've banned this perfectly good dog along with some other very fine breeds, the Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino, and Fila Braziliero. I am outraged by this British inconsistency. Why not lock these dogs up for a few years in dog years -- probably 3 or 4 months -- and then release them back into society. They probably all have much better records than the Islamic Terrorists they are releasing.