Tuesday, September 6, 2011

The advance of Islam and Sharia Law in Britain

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2395/walls-divide-europe This is an article by Herbert London, dated September 1, 2011 from the Hudson New York. It is entitled “The Walls that Divide Europe” and subtitled “Sweden is the Best Islamic State.”

Here is the first part of the article:

“Walls can be used to keep people in and keep people out, as was true of he Berlin Wall erected in 1961 and today of the walls being erected throughout Europe.

“These contemporary walls operate under the name of "no go" zones, areas that are off limits to non-Muslims. These zones function as micro-states governed by Sharia Law. In many locations from Malmo to Hamburg, and from Liverpool to Rotterdam, host country authorities have lost effective control over these zones, and often are unable to provide even basic public aid -- such as police and fire assistance and ambulance services -- without permission from the local imam.

“Here, in unvarnished terms, are the influences of multicultural policies that encouraged Muslim immigrants to live in parallel societies "walled in" through both a desire for separation and the host's desire to avoid integration.

“In Britain, for example, a Muslim group called Muslims Against The Crusades, has launched a campaign to convert twelve British cities – including London – into independent Islamic states. In the "Tower Hamlets" area of East London, extremist Muslim preachers routinely issue death threats to women who refuse to wear Islamic veils. Neighborhood streets are plastered with posters that declare: "You are entering a Sharia controlled zone; Islamic rules enforced." The Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying, "How dare you come to a Muslim area!"

COMMENT: Someone from Britain recently commented that indeed there were these enclaves, but they were forced upon the immigrants because the common people wouldn’t accept them. London agrees with this. The common people have no wish for integration with them, but the Muslims are of the same mind. They want to be separate. A desire to be separate would be consistent with my understanding of the Koran. Muslims are forbidden from treating infidels as equals. In the literalistic fundamentalist sense, Muslims are ordered to kill infidels if they won’t convert. However, as long as Muslims are in the minority they are permitted to mislead their hosts on this and other matters.

While this is the literal sense of the Koran, one wonders how many Muslims are so intense in their beliefs that they would willingly kill their infidel neighbors should Islam ever end up the majority point of view. On the other hand, it is probably naïve to hope that benign human-nature will win out over the dictates of fanatical imams.

And what sorts of thoughts go through the minds of the Left Wing Radicals, one wonders, who blame the common people in Britain and elsewhere in Europe for resisting this Islamic encroachment?

No comments: