Mike writes, Where would you draw the line on what kind of weapons an individual can own, Lawrence? And why would you draw it there?
Lawrence responds: The implication of what you write seems to be that if I argue that individuals have a right to bear arms, my argument is absurd or ludicrous because I must be arguing that the individual has a right to bear every arm that exists including nuclear weapons.
When the second amendment was established, my understanding is that “arms” were considered to be the arms a common soldier might carry. What arms does the common soldier carry today? A rifle and a handgun. That’s what I carried when I was in the Marine Corps. You let the common citizen own rifles and handguns up to and including the rifles and handguns carried by our soldiers and Marines and I doubt very much that any 2nd Amendment Rights advocate is going to complain.
Lawrence Helm
No comments:
Post a Comment